Lebesgue’s Monotone Convergence Theorem

Say has a measure , and let be measurable and .

Then as .

Proof

Note that is a measurable function as

Let as .
Let , measurable simple function, and .
Let .

Then measurable, and

Continuing (*)

Say .
If , then .
If , then , so for some , and .

By the previous two lemmas, we have

, so and

QED.

Corollary - Fatou’s Lemma

Defined in the lecture here: Fatou’s Lemma

Definition

Have measure on , and measurable. Then

Proof

Use Lebesgue’s Monotone Convergence Theorem on .
are measurable functions.
QED

Lebesgue’s Dominated Convergence Theorem

(Also defined here, it’s the same thing)

Let be a real function on .

Define , .

Then and .

Definition

Given measure on .
Define .

Define integral for by .

Use .

The integral definition makes sense as each integral on the RHS is finite.
()

Lemma

Given measure .

Then measurable simple functions such that

  1. pointwise

Proof

Define by

Continue like this.

Have .

Set .


Exercise part of the session.

These exercises are from Exercise 8.

Question 3

Prove when

Proof

Have , so


.

Question 4

Show that if has a -algebra and set. Then the collection of subsets such that measurable, is a -algebra.


prove that is a -algebra.

Proof

  1. Have since .
  2. If , then , so .
  3. If , then , so , so .

A question I don’t know the number of

Say and they are topological spaces.
Show that if is measurable, then is Borel measurable for any Borel set .

Proof

Consider . This is a -algebra.

It contains all the open sets in since is measurable and then is Borel measurable for open.

Hence contains all the Borel sets in . If is Borel, then , so is Borel. (Note: not sure if on this if the “Borel”s are about them being Borel sets or Borel measurable)

Question 5

with -algebra .
is measurable .

Proof

“Obvious”.

In balls are , , , or for .

Any open set in is a countable union of these “building blocks”.

Checking they belong to :


  • QED.

is measurable
is measurable

Can also use infimum instead

Now need to check if is measurable and is in



Why is the set and the union both the same?