Let be a measure space. For and a measurable function , then we define .

Note


A pair of conjugate exponents is , , or with and . Note that is okay (it also gives you a Hilbert space).

Proposition

Let be measurable on . Then (Hölder’s Inequality) and (Minkowski’s Inequality) for any pair of Conjugate Exponents with .

Proof

Hölder’s Inequality

To show Hölder’s Inequality, we may assume that , are positive real numbers

Need:

when and .

Use (* from the note above) with , , , for such that .

Then

Integration gives

Minkowski’s Inequality

To get Minkowski’s Inequality, note that by Hölder’s Inequality.

And similarly

Then combine the two



Then we have

(This is something that you can check)

And then we get the Minkowski’s Inequality.
Provided the denominator is , this can be assumed: Minkowski’s Inequality holds if . If , then since .

QED.

-spaces

Let . By Minkowski’s Inequality the set of measure with on is a complex vector space . Note .

We have almost a norm on , except almost everywhere.

In fact almost everywhere, in that measure such that and .

Example


Example

on .

Example

Define equivalence relation on by if almost everywhere.
Then will be a vector space and with norm . Then almost everywhere, so .

Theorem

is a Banach Space.
is a Hilbert space with .


Exercises

This is the exercise part of the lecture.

Exercise 3.3.6 Question 2

, measurable such that .
Show that almost everywhere.
Hint: , where .

Proof

If , then , so for some .

Then , which is a contradiction.

So and almost everywhere.

QED.

Exercise 3.4.5 Question 3

What is for when is the counting measure?

On "counting measure"

I thing “counting measure” is the same way that has been said in short hand with “measure” for all the previous lectures.

Proof

all functions. .

What is



Say .
Then (define: ) if any is infinite.

For any finite subset of , define

Then is a simple function, and . Have

since


Then
(, continuous measure)

almost everywhere since