Let be a measure space. For and a measurable function , then we define .
Note
A pair of conjugate exponents is , , or with and . Note that is okay (it also gives you a Hilbert space).
Proposition
Let be measurable on . Then (Hölder’s Inequality) and (Minkowski’s Inequality) for any pair of Conjugate Exponents with .
Proof
Hölder’s Inequality
To show Hölder’s Inequality, we may assume that , are positive real numbers
Need:
when and .
Use (* from the note above) with , , , for such that .
Then
Integration gives
Minkowski’s Inequality
To get Minkowski’s Inequality, note that by Hölder’s Inequality.
And similarly
Then combine the two
Then we have
(This is something that you can check)
And then we get the Minkowski’s Inequality.
Provided the denominator is , this can be assumed: Minkowski’s Inequality holds if . If , then since .
QED.
-spaces
Let . By Minkowski’s Inequality the set of measure with on is a complex vector space . Note .
Note
We have almost a norm on , except almost everywhere.
In fact almost everywhere, in that measure such that and .
Example
Example
on .
Example
Define equivalence relation on by if almost everywhere.
Then will be a vector space and with norm . Then almost everywhere, so .
Theorem
is a Banach Space.
is a Hilbert space with .
Exercises
This is the exercise part of the lecture.
Exercise 3.3.6 Question 2
, measurable such that .
Show that almost everywhere.
Hint: , where .
Proof
If , then , so for some .
Then , which is a contradiction.
So and almost everywhere.
QED.
Exercise 3.4.5 Question 3
What is for when is the counting measure?
On "counting measure"
I thing “counting measure” is the same way that has been said in short hand with “measure” for all the previous lectures.
Proof
all functions. .
What is
Say .
Then (define: ) if any is infinite.
For any finite subset of , define
Then is a simple function, and . Have
since
Then
(, continuous measure)
almost everywhere since